Archive

Archive for the ‘Astronomy’ Category

Major News, Minor Ripple in the Newsiverse

March 9th, 2008 Stephen No comments

Snapshot of the early universe, showing temperature fluctuations of the remnant glow from the Big Bang.

It’s official, the universe is 13.73 billion years old, give or take 120 million years.

This profound news, and other findings released with it, appears not to have generated a huge reception other than in the scientific community. To my mind, this is probably the world’s biggest news item. True, some of news isn’t radically new, but it confirms what we know with greater accuracy. It is new in the sense that it narrows down the facts, eliminates some theories, and gives us a more precise picture of the universe.

The findings are from the study of 5 years of data from Nasa’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). This satellite was designed to map the universe by examining the light, seen in the form of microwaves, created soon after the so-called Big Bang. The probe basically looks back to when the universe was 380,000 years old. At this point the universe cooled enough for protons and electrons to combine into hydrogen atoms, which released light. Then, over the billions of years of the expansion of the Universe, the light has cooled and its wavelength has been stretched from ultraviolet to microwave.

FromWMAP press release here, comes this news:

The universe is awash in a sea of cosmic neutrinos. These almost weightless sub-atomic particles zip around at nearly the speed of light. Millions of cosmic neutrinos pass through you every second.

“A block of lead the size of our entire solar system wouldn’t even come close to stopping a cosmic neutrino,” said science team member Eiichiro Komatsu of the University of Texas at Austin.

I’m starting to feel kind of itchy. Would it be fair to say that the neutrinos passing through me have possibly passed through other things, like a planet? I presume so.

Here are the other main WMAP results, as summarized by Phil Plait, the astronomy, writer, and skeptic of Bad Astronomy fame:

A lot of this information was determined a while back, just a couple of years after WMAP launched. But now they have released the Five Year Data, a comprehensive analysis of what all that data means. Here’s a quick rundown:

  • The age of the Universe is 13.73 billion years, plus or minus 120 million years. Some people might say it doesn’t look a day over 6000 years. They’re wrong.
  • The image above shows the temperature difference between different parts of the sky. Red is hotter, blue is cooler. However, the difference is incredibly small: the entire temperature range from cold to hot is only 0.0002 degrees Celsius. The average temperature is 2.725 Kelvin, so you’re seeing temperatures from 2.7248 to 2.7252 Kelvins.
  • The age of the Universe when recombination occurred was 375,938 years, +/- about 3100 years. Wow.
  • The Universe is flat.
  • The energy budget of the Universe is the total amount of energy and matter in the whole cosmos added up. Together with some other observations, WMAP has been able to determine just how much of that budget is occupied by dark energy, dark matter, and normal matter. What they got was: the Universe is 72.1% dark energy, 23.3% dark matter, and 4.62% normal matter. You read that right: everything you can see, taste, hear, touch, just sense in any way… is less than 5% of the whole Universe.

At point one, you’ll note that Phil makes an amusing aside about the morons who believe the universe is 6000 years old. Which relates to why I’m a bit disgruntled about the low register in the media regarding this news. If only significant news in science were given a more prominent position in the media, people would be more educated. More creationists and other wackos might be urged to reexamine their beliefs more closely and discover them for what they are, childish delusions.

Anything to do with uncovering the nature of the universe, one would think, is worthy of front page headlines. It’s the biggest news out there.

Categories: Astronomy Tags:

A Short History of a Self-Centred Cosmos

March 2nd, 2005 Stephen No comments


Enlarge.

In primitive times, the world was a place where the supernatural operated everywhere, including in the heavens. It was a world of magical cosmology, when human beings regarded themselves as not only unified with the cosmos and influenced by it, but as also able to have an influence on it. This primitive mentality operated towards the cosmos for thousands of years.

Although a extensive knowledge of the skies over this time was accumulated, it still didn’t explain the universe, so, as civilizations developed, they continued to create stories and myths to explain it. These were central to culture. In Egypt, for instance, mythical views on the cosmos became central to Egyptian religion and were intimately linked to daily life and thinking.

With Babylonian astronomy, things become more sophisticated in terms of record keeping. However, this was largely to facilitate predictions that would aid in fortune telling—human beings continued to regard the cosmos as intimately linked to them and able to influence daily life. Nonetheless, the data collected by the Babylonians was passed on the Ancient Greeks. They were the ones who attempted to construct a cosmological model that would correspond to observable phenomenon.

In the 4th century BC, with their love of geometry and universal laws, the Greeks arrived at the idea that the stars were fixed on a celestial sphere which rotated about Earth every 24 hours. The planets, the Sun and the Moon, moved between the Earth and the stars. It was a model improved upon in the 2nd century AD with Ptolemy’s system, based on the heavenly objects moving in circles. This would later all tie in nicely with Christian teachings on God’s plan.

Thus, as cosmological views became more sophisticated, so did self centred notions. As time went on, Christian perception of the cosmos developed into the form of a grand and integrated theory held together with a chain of being that was topped by the Almighty. First, though, Christian thinkers needed to reconcile Greek astronomy with their theological standards, as the logic and science of the Ancient Greeks was not easily dismissed.

Augustine, born in 354, is the one credited with weaving Platonic ideas into Christian theology. It continued to be accepted that the cosmos was spherical with the earth at its centre. Nor did this change once the writings of Aristotle become more widely known and the Platonic cosmological view became less popular. If Augustine is best known for absorbing Plato’s philosophy into Christianity, Thomas Aquinas is best known for absorbing Aristotle’s philosophy and physics into Christian thinking in the 13th century.

Aquinas would combine reason and faith based on the notion that logic, mathematics and science contributed to and was a part of Christian thought. With that, Aristotle’s universe of circular motion and crystalline spheres became the Christian worldview. In other words, the philosophical science begun with the Ancient Greeks became an integral part of religious belief and how life and the universe were perceived.

There is perhaps no better synthesis of all of the thought of this era than Dante’s encyclopedic Commedia, in which human beings are part of a rigidly ordered and finely tuned spiritual chain of being. It shows how finely conceived the Aristotelian world view was, how everything fit together so well. The universe was perfectly ordered just as God the architect had designed it.

No wonder the self-centred cosmos was popular. For quite some time, humans rejoiced in the idea that the Earth was at the centre of the universe and everything in it was for the benefit of human beings. It was all very cosy and self-congratulatory.

However, in the 16th century, Copernicus proposed a heliocentric system in which the Earth together with the other planets rotated about the sun. It was rather unsettling. If Copernicus’ theory were correct, all prior cosmological notions would have to be reaccessed, the scientific and the religious. Naturally, the Church opposed the preposterous idea that Earth was not the centre of the universe, as Copernicus knew it would.

Another forward thinker, Kepler, made a bolder step at the end of the 16th century and proposed that not only was the Earth orbiting around the Sun but that the heavenly bodies where travelling in ellipses and not circles. He was a devout Christian who believed that mathematical and geometric laws were a reflection of God. He really was keen to restore astronomical order.

Giordano Bruno, a supporter of Copernicus’s heliocentric theory, went further to argue that the universe was infinite with an infinite number of worlds. He also proposed that these were inhabited by intelligent beings. For such impertinences and other misdemeanors the Inquisition burned him alive at the stake at the beginning of 1600.

Naturally, the Christian church had a lot to be concerned about. Any threat to the prevailing cosmological view meant a threat the religion itself. A change in how the universe was seen would have repercussions that would impact on all other modes of thought including humankind’s relationship with God. It threatened the providential importance of humankind. Upset the worldview and you upset reality.

In the early 17th century, with the aid of the newly invented telescope, Galileo discovered moons orbiting the planet Jupiter and believed that this proved that the planets orbited about the Sun. It meant the Earth could not be at the centre of the Universe. Not only that, Galileo discovered thousands of new stars invisible to the naked eye. The cosmos was a black sea of stars. Isaac Newton would later conclude that the Universe must be an infinite and eternal sea of stars, each like the Sun.

However, the Church would have none of this nonsense about a stationary sun. Sure, theories could be proposed and discussed, but no one is going to tinker with a self-centred mass delusion. Once the Inquisition got on Galileo’s case it would not let go in favour of defending the Aristotelian view of the cosmos. In the end, Galileo was forced to live out his days under house arrest.

Nonetheless, the 17th century was a time devoted as much to religion as to science. Gradually, the astronomical revolution Copernicus and Galileo contributed to eroded the foundations of earlier religious belief. In other words, as cosmological reality changed, so did the reality of what it means to exist on Earth.

Humankind had been expelled from the centre of everything into space and burdened with a reduced significance in the scheme of things. This decentralized position gave rise to decentralized thinking and an enhanced sense of relativism, which found expression in all walks of life. In fact, the discovery of a boundless space in which the Earth revolved about the sun became liberating. It allowed humankind to dust itself off and locate itself at a new centre.

What emerged during the Renaissance was a view of reality that compensated for humankind’s loss of importance. In a world that was no longer the centre of all things, the new stable measure of human life and reality would be Man himself. With the concept of the individual was on the rise, humankind was given a new dignity as the measure of all things. Happily, humans could regarded themselves as admirably as ever.

Of course, the Christian God, so difficult to dislodge, remained alive and well. Acceptance of an infinite cosmos led to a sharper examination of the infinity within and the idea that a living God was manifest in everything. His immanence could be realized through examining the world and its mathematical and astronomical truths. Once again, this led to a convenience merging of cosmological and religious realities.

Isaac Newton reconciled the two and in the process rewrote Christian theology. He was bent on proving that the machinery of the world, a veritable clockwork universe, was so perfectly contrived that it could only be the result of an intelligent and consistent plan. But the resulting worldview, helped along by philosophers like Descartes, was somewhat cold and mechanistic. Creatures became regarded as automata and cause and effect determinism ruled existence.

The 18th century brought a scientific revolution that celebrated systematic doubt, empirical and sensory verification. These changes affected every aspect of life. Now, religion was not necessary to explain anything as the universe was fundamentally rational and mechanistic. All knowledge was converted into rational systems. What this meant for the human creature was that it was subject to the same laws and composed of the same stuff as any other creature. Humankind’s place of importance was eroding.

Understanding of the cosmos expanded in the 19th century with the realization that Earth existed within a massive disk or galaxy of stars, the Milky Way. It was concluded that the sun was near the centre of this vast disk. Kant and others had proposed that our Milky Way was a lens shaped “island universe” or galaxy, and that beyond it must be other galaxies. Astronomers indeed noted fuzzy patches of light and speculated these might be distant galaxies. Vast distances were also being calculated for the nearest stars.

It was not until the 1920’s that scientists proved that the Earth and sun were nowhere near the centre of the Milky Way. And others, like the American astronomer Hubble, established that there were indeed distant galaxies comparable in size to our own Milky Way. Hubble also made the remarkable discovery that these galaxies seemed to be moving away from us, with a speed proportional to their distance.

It was soon realized with the help of Einstein’s recently discovered General Theory of Relativity that our universe was expanding. An expanding universe implied that it had been created in one instant, and the galaxies were still travelling away from that initial expansion. The British astronomer Fred Hoyle dismissively called the creation instance the “Big Bang,” and the name stuck.

Big Bang theory was still debated until 1965, when Penzias and Wilson discovered cosmic microwave background radiation, indicating that the Big Bang did happen. This is a kind of faint afterglow of the intense radiation that was given off by the Big Bang.

Finally, after luxuriating at the centre of the universe for so long, humankind has arrived at better approximating of the reality of its position. From being the centre of the universe, it now finds itself inhabiting a tiny ball of rock in the vastness of space. It finds itself insignificant and of no importance to the scheme of things. Not only does it have no influence on the cosmos, it inhabits a cosmos that completely ignores it.

Is the universe just a part of a grand fractal structure consisting of other universes? Who knows. What remains now is to come up with a grand unified theory, to finally arrive at a conclusion on the structure and shape of the universe; to get to the bottom of the string theory; to uncover what existed prior to the Big Bang and explain what dark energy and dark matter are, and, well, so the list goes on.

Categories: Astronomy Tags:

The Universe and Stuff

February 19th, 2005 Stephen No comments

What you are looking at on the left is the spiral galaxy M31 or Andromeda, which looks much like our galaxy, the Milky Way, only we’re a little smaller. It’s amazing that, as you gaze at this small image of the galaxy, you are looking at around 200 billion stars on a scale that the mind has trouble to grasp. Andromeda is bright enough to be seen with the naked eye and is the closest galaxy to us. Light takes about 2.9 million years to reach us from there. It’s the nearest large galaxy to us. However, it’s not the nearest galaxy. That credit goes to the Canis Major dwarf galaxy, which is puny with only about 1 billion suns.

Of course, there is life out there, anyone with common sense can recognize that. You only have to look at the history of earth to realize that given the right conditions it’s going to happen anywhere; and the right conditions are invariably present in galaxies all over the universe.

That’s mind blowing enough, but cosmologists believe that when our universe begin, which involved the unfolding of time and space and all forms of matter and energy, it was from a point a little bigger than the size of the dot at the end of this sentence. Quite frankly, I can’t get my head around that.

Nonetheless, it is generally agreed among most astronomers and physicists that the Universe was created around 13.7 billion years ago with this unfolding or “Big Bang.” It was not an explosion as the theory’s name suggests, just an expansion or inflation event. There is little known about it as everything we can see today with telescopes can only tell us about objects which have existed in the last 10 billion years. It difficult to go back further.

As for the shape of the universe, well, it’s unlikely to be spherical, even though that is perhaps the easiest thing to imagine. One of the latest theories suggests that the universe is funnel shaped, like a medieval horn; but most compelling and generally agreed upon is that the universe is flat and will continue to expand forever. Apart from that, its basic structure is supposedly like bubbles in a bubble bath with superclusters of galaxies existing on the surface of the bubbles and surround large voids containing virtually nothing.

The thing about how the cosmos is viewed is that it influences thinking in all other aspects of life. It has always been inextricably linked to philosophical and religious thought. The worldviews in earlier times were basically anthropocentric, a self-centred perspective that would not be corrected for thousands of years. But the history of cosmology over the last 600 years or so is one in which the self-centred or geocentric worldview of humanity, together with its philosophical and religious support base, has been slowly but surely dismantled.

The Ancient Greeks were the ones who first endeavoured to put together a comprehensive cosmological model based on geometry and science rather than mythology. In the 4th century BC, they conceived of a spherical universe with the stars fixed on the outer sphere and the sun and the planets in between. The earth, of course, sat fixed at the centre. This geocentric worldview was adopted by Christian thinkers hundreds of years later. Platos model of the universe became widely accepted until it was superseded by Aristotle’s model in the 13th century.

There is perhaps no better synthesis of all of the thought of the age than Dante’s encyclopedic Commedia, in which human beings are a part of a rigidly ordered and finely tuned spiritual chain of being. Human beings remain at the centre of the universe, their affairs of central importance and meaning in their lives locked in with the fundamentals of a grand divine scheme. Of course, it’s laughable now, but one can imagine how this cosy arrangement would have infused the lives of human beings with an enormous sense of self-satisfaction and security.

It was finally and grudgingly acknowledged in the 17th century that the astronomical conceptions of Copernicus and Galileo were correct and that it was in fact the sun and not the earth that sat at the centre of the universe. In other words, humankind was decentralized, and this resulted more relativistic thinking, which was helped along by such things as the discovery of new lands and peoples around the globe.

Whatever loss of face there was for humanity, it didn’t last long with Renaissance thinkers emphasizing the idea of humankind as the measure of all things and placing a new emphasis on the notion of the individual. So, human beings could still congratulate themselves for having a central position in scheme of things. Besides, people still believed that humanity actually mattered to God, not even a planetary shift could upset that arrangement. Humanity then could not have accepted the rug been pulled out from under that one. Its anthropocentric worldview was not fundamentally damaged, and the centuries old comforts of egocentric thinking and arrogance could continue.The great chain of being and the lofty position humanity enjoyed on it were finally toppled with the scientific advancements of the 18th and 19th centuries. The significance of humanity diminished further, even if Newton’s mechanical world was still conveniently populated with a God. The prevailing thought was to see everything in materialistic terms, as mechanical and bound by nature’s course. Charles Darwin then dealt the great chain of being a death blow with evidence that human beings had evolutionary origins like any other animal. The artificial, somewhat pompous heirarchy of being was finally disassembled. To add to an ever declining significance in the grand scheme of things, it was found that the earth existed within a massive galaxy of stars. Although, it was still thought that the sun was at the centre of it.

Naturally, philosophical movements concentrating on nature and consciousness and self and other existential issues were all the rage from the 19th century onwards. Knowledge itself was put under the spotlight. Soon it was realized that not only was the sun not at the centre of a galaxy but the galaxy itself was just one of many in a vast universe. In the 1920’s it was proven that the Earth and sun were no where near the centre of the Milky Way. Hubble then established that there were indeed distant galaxies comparable in size to our own Milky Way and that our universe was expanding. At last, humanity was starting to be well and truly put in its place, and God well and truly out of the picture.

But by this time humankind’s self-esteem was low after years of insult at the hands of scientific discovery. Of course, further discoveries concerning the universe haven’t made much of an impact on philosophical and religious thinking, because once you’re totally insignificant you can’t get any lower. Freud and those that followed him then assaulted the last bastion of human anthropocentric arrogance by decentralizing the mind itself. God couldn’t even lurk there. There was no longer an essence or soul or whatever one might want to call it. Not only that, what you might call an “I” or who we are was no longer guaranteed.

So, we arrive at a picture of the universe radically different to the one pictured in the 14th century. For all intents and purposes, it is safe to say that life on earth has no purpose and struggles in an existence that is essentially meaningless. As has already been said time and again, for more than 300 years, since the time of Isaac Newton, science has been understood by most educated people to have established that the universe is incomprehensibly vast and full of mostly empty space, with stars scattered at great distances. There is no center, no purpose, no location for God, and no obvious meaning for human beings.

This is nothing new, but when you think about the potential end to our universe it deepens the impact of a meaningless reality. How is the universe going to end? It is generally agreed that the universe will continue to expand, with dark energy making it expand faster and faster. Some say that it will expand forever. Whether it does or not, presumably a point will be reached when all light and energy has been extinguished, ordinary matter has disintegrated, and all life is non-existent. At that point everything will be left drifting in an incredibly cold and boundless darkness.

But, not to worry, it’s only nature’s way.

THE MEANING OF LIFE IS THAT THERE IS NO MEANING.

Categories: Astronomy Tags: